Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Had no real reason for that, but it could provide as a source for discussion.
(Note: I was not trying to gain the top-posting rank!)
(2nd Note: Times here are GMT+1)
(Note: I was not trying to gain the top-posting rank!)
(2nd Note: Times here are GMT+1)
-
- Wise Scribe
- Posts: 342
- Joined: July 11th, 2009, 4:28 am
- Location: Somewhere in the Milky Way
- Contact:
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
I'm a wise scribe! What is the highest ranking for non-special people like me?
Former Member of popuw.com/forum
-
- Sultan
- Posts: 153
- Joined: February 27th, 2010, 8:35 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Well deserved, congrats to all!
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Prince of Persia, with 1000 posts, if I am not mistaken.Eagle-Head Priest 97 wrote:What is the highest ranking for non-special people like me?
1.25 posts a day here. And I only have 12.05% of all the posts here. But whatever...programmer wrote:OMG. Do I really spam this much?
*quick look at profile*
...not really. 0.21 posts a day is hardly spamming
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Well, it is funny you find things to discuss around here. I remember last time (on PoP-UW) I had around 1800 posts when they closed down,with an average (out the top of my head) of around 6 posts/day*. Here I don't find anything worth saying any more. Whatever, I'm still coming over to see you guys and gals, from time to time.
* I remember mk1994 with, what was it, 35 posts/day? and a huge accusation of being a spammer...
* I remember mk1994 with, what was it, 35 posts/day? and a huge accusation of being a spammer...
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
When I first registered to PoPUW, I had 50 posts a day, so I gained a rank every day (since, you know, your rank increased once every 50 posts). But a good time later, my posts-a-day decreased up until about 20. Surely they went down more and more when I was gone for a while (I wish it really would've been only a while - since PoPUW went down), but when it came to posting, I was so ahead of the others... I kept the first rank until the end.
Beats me, though, why people considered me a spammer. Sure, it must be due to my quantity of posts-a-day and the fact that my posts weren't the most productive of them all (Hey, I was only 11/12 at that time, sue me!), but I never really intended to spam the forums. It just happened that there was lots I could contribute to (in a more or less productive way) and all those games in the off-topic section just invited you to legitimately increase your post count...
Beats me, though, why people considered me a spammer. Sure, it must be due to my quantity of posts-a-day and the fact that my posts weren't the most productive of them all (Hey, I was only 11/12 at that time, sue me!), but I never really intended to spam the forums. It just happened that there was lots I could contribute to (in a more or less productive way) and all those games in the off-topic section just invited you to legitimately increase your post count...
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Half are ancient scribe (moderator). 8 out of 10 have a special status.
-
- Vizier
- Posts: 98
- Joined: December 29th, 2008, 7:48 pm
- Location: Vilnius,Lithuania
- Contact:
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Another "no last century POP game" fellow, eh ?John Wain wrote: Here I don't find anything worth saying any more
exactly what I'm doingJohn Wain wrote: Whatever, I'm still coming over to see you guys and gals, from time to time.
sTank
Neogogeta
L O S T Forever
Neogogeta
L O S T Forever
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Ha, ha! That made my day, Neogogeta. I'll go to sleep with a smile on my face... though technically you're correct about PoP 1 & 2 being from the last century, to my mind the phrase conveys the meaning of '100 years', so...Neogogeta wrote:Another "no last century POP game" fellow, eh ?John Wain wrote: Here I don't find anything worth saying any more
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Hell yeah if i look to that results
mk over the 400 posts
BTW IM No. FOUR !
mk over the 400 posts
BTW IM No. FOUR !
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Ill search it for you... ill edit if i founded..Eagle-Head Priest 97 wrote:I'm a wise scribe! What is the highest ranking for non-special people like me?
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Oh please... Did you know English any better when you were 10? OK, maybe he does use an online translator, but still... A bad English is no excuse to publicly bash someone, as far as I know.programmer wrote:Now go check what "founded" means.tristan1993 wrote:founded..
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Hey people! We are just a lot of foreigners speaking bad english...
We think we know english but we know our english will never be the english of an american or an english, australian, etc. Get the last three posters here including me...
- programmer speaks polish natively
- mk1995 speaks german natively
- tristan1993 speaks dutch natively
- and I speak natively the awesome portuguese!!!
How could we meet each other if we hadn't a common language?
We think we know english but we know our english will never be the english of an american or an english, australian, etc. Get the last three posters here including me...
- programmer speaks polish natively
- mk1995 speaks german natively
- tristan1993 speaks dutch natively
- and I speak natively the awesome portuguese!!!
How could we meet each other if we hadn't a common language?
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
can you make a new topic or poll for this??
Re: Top 10 posters on the 10th of March 2010
Simple: Meet at some place in the world and talk English.Butcher wrote:How could we meet each other if we hadn't a common language?
Or what did you mean?